<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No deal is better than a deal that pretends to be one!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climatesos.org/2009/08/nodea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climatesos.org/2009/08/nodea/</link>
	<description>Enough compromises, the climate crisis is real!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:31:25 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Vernon</title>
		<link>http://www.climatesos.org/2009/08/nodea/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Vernon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 04:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatesos.org/?p=1#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Please point out that carbon capture and storage (CCS--what the coal industry calls &quot;clean coal&quot;) is a false solution that ACESA would subsidize. Unless it&#039;s explicitly demanded that CCS subsidies be removed, the coal politicians will find a way to use them to prop up the industry and prolong our reliance on coal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please point out that carbon capture and storage (CCS&#8211;what the coal industry calls &#8220;clean coal&#8221;) is a false solution that ACESA would subsidize. Unless it&#8217;s explicitly demanded that CCS subsidies be removed, the coal politicians will find a way to use them to prop up the industry and prolong our reliance on coal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell Lowes</title>
		<link>http://www.climatesos.org/2009/08/nodea/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell Lowes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 17:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatesos.org/?p=1#comment-26</guid>
		<description>James Hansen may very well have become a policy expert, by this point in time. From being a scientist, to being a scientist that was temporarily partially shut up by the Bush Administration (including inadvertent cancellations of his appointments and speaking engagements) to being arrested in a civil disobedience at a coal facility, he may have come that far. Don&#039;t box him in. Don&#039;t just discount him because he&#039;s &quot;a scientist.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James Hansen may very well have become a policy expert, by this point in time. From being a scientist, to being a scientist that was temporarily partially shut up by the Bush Administration (including inadvertent cancellations of his appointments and speaking engagements) to being arrested in a civil disobedience at a coal facility, he may have come that far. Don&#8217;t box him in. Don&#8217;t just discount him because he&#8217;s &#8220;a scientist.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tanuki</title>
		<link>http://www.climatesos.org/2009/08/nodea/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>tanuki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 16:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatesos.org/?p=1#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Sure, but policy experts are purchased more easily than climate scientists who are saying things counter to corporate interest.  Just sayin&#039; ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, but policy experts are purchased more easily than climate scientists who are saying things counter to corporate interest.  Just sayin&#8217; <img src='http://www.climatesos.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JDilla</title>
		<link>http://www.climatesos.org/2009/08/nodea/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>JDilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 16:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatesos.org/?p=1#comment-16</guid>
		<description>James Hansen is a climate scientist, not a policy expert.

Just sayin&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James Hansen is a climate scientist, not a policy expert.</p>
<p>Just sayin&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shelly Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.climatesos.org/2009/08/nodea/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Shelly Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 23:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatesos.org/?p=1#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Futurism Now supports a revenue-neutral carbon tax or a tax and dividend system as recommended by James Hansen.... the ACESA bill is weak and it&#039;s not even a climate bill, and it  won&#039;t do nearly enough to solve climate change fast enough. Climate goals are meaningless with no realistic way to meet them. Let&#039;s stop going with the flow, everyone.... The flow will get us all drowned with rising sea levels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Futurism Now supports a revenue-neutral carbon tax or a tax and dividend system as recommended by James Hansen&#8230;. the ACESA bill is weak and it&#8217;s not even a climate bill, and it  won&#8217;t do nearly enough to solve climate change fast enough. Climate goals are meaningless with no realistic way to meet them. Let&#8217;s stop going with the flow, everyone&#8230;. The flow will get us all drowned with rising sea levels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Gagnon</title>
		<link>http://www.climatesos.org/2009/08/nodea/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Gagnon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatesos.org/?p=1#comment-13</guid>
		<description>YES; I agree 100%. Cap &amp; Trade is not the answer to our problems. I think we need to Cap and Trade-In our elected officials and find ones with a more realistic and less corrupt bill. More content please…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YES; I agree 100%. Cap &amp; Trade is not the answer to our problems. I think we need to Cap and Trade-In our elected officials and find ones with a more realistic and less corrupt bill. More content please…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.climatesos.org/2009/08/nodea/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatesos.org/?p=1#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Our organization supports James Hansen&#039;s recommendations for a realistic climate bill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our organization supports James Hansen&#8217;s recommendations for a realistic climate bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
